![]() Just increased page loading time on & reduced image size 20%, without compromising quality w/ In 2015, if your website is loading slowly, your visitors will go somewhere else. If the photo file sizes are too big, your website will load slowly. ![]() Smaller photo file sizes are a big deal for websites too. With smaller file sizes you’ll be able to send more photos to your client via email or maximize the space on a flash drive. You’re exporting the JPEG under 90% because you want your photo file size to be smaller for various reasons. Why aren’t you exporting your photos at 90% or even 100%? Simple reason is file size. Should you choose save for web? Or do you set the JPEG quality slide bar under 90%? However, it’s with these tools that you can manipulate the photos as you see fit.Īt the end of every editing process, you are posed with a question on how should you set your JPEG export settings. No matter what tool you use, you know that this is going to be time consuming. Once the photo selection is over, we get straight to work on editing the photos we’ve singled out. We want to make sure we give our clients the best of the best! Blurry photos, bad lighting, centering, and even closed eyes won’t make the cut. Photo quality is the reason why we don’t just go straight to printing right after a shoot. I won’t go in as to why it’s important, since every reason is correct. Yes, I know this is a rhetorical question because photo quality is very important to all of us. If I were to ask you, on a scale of 1-10, how important is photo quality to you? You would most likely answer me 11. Photographers stake their reputation on photo quality. Sapon on 5 Reasons Why BPG Will Eventually Replace JPEG.Lentrll Mectkey on What Are The New Camera Features Of The iPhone 8, 8 Plus And iPhone X?.Chris Greenwood on How To Book More Weddings Without Paying For Any Advertising.annie on Reduce Your Photoshop Workload With JPEGmini.Daniel Penwarden on How To Book More Weddings Without Paying For Any Advertising.Pol Divina, a “Michelin Food Photographer”.JPEGmini 3.5 Has Arrived with more Video Features!.Epic Black Friday Deals For Photographers & Creators 2022.Audiolove: The Bridge Between Live Music and Photography.A Guide to Image Sizing for Photographers & Creators.The tool uses a predefined threshold and determines how far it can compress.Ĭhime back in with your final results/preference. From experience, the feature I think is unique is the automatic one click processing. Notice how it doesn't compare itself to other software, it just promotes itself. Most hate it because it tries too hard to sell itself when other free open source tools also exist and do the same. I also read on a few other forums users' opinions of jpegmini. Extremely handy! I only wish it showed more of the tool's internal options. I used to have a script for compressing PNGs with PNGOUT but now RIOT allows to process them in batch. I tried the tool the user posted on this thread but it produced some weird results, on a few images it cropped the picture by a few pixels. Messing with the Chroma and Luma channels is something nearly every jpeg compressing tool does and I'd like to know which one I'm using to compare their features. I liked RIOT very much but I wish it showed which external tools it uses besides the PNG ones. Hopefully being open source means others will step up with with cool new ideas. I'm sure there are a ton of optimizations to be made, but to be totally honest my math and C programming skills are not the best. if it's a picture of clouds then lower the quality slightly and if it's an intricate building then increase the quality a bit. One thing I would like to add is some measure of overall image complexity, e.g. what's the average pixel value, how do the pixels vary, what's the relationship between the original variance and the reference block variance, etc. The algorithm I use is SSIM, which works by measuring relationships between pixels in 8x8 blocks, e.g. ![]() I haven't read the patents (and won't due to possibly tainting my own code with information from them). JPEGmini actually uses some custom patented algorithm for perceived image quality. That's much better than throwing away too much. Luckily it errs on the side of caution and throws away less data than JPEGmini. I think the groups of solid colors are problematic. Thanks! Feel free to contribute the bat file if you think it'll be useful for others. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |